White v. State

713 So. 2d 429, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 598, 1998 WL 28090
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2826
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 713 So. 2d 429 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. State, 713 So. 2d 429, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 598, 1998 WL 28090 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. Pursuant to the State’s proper confession of error, this cause is remanded for the court to calculate the correct amount of credit to which defendant is entitled for time served in prison during the incarcerative portion of his original split sentence. Sainvilus v. State, 689 So.2d 1261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); see Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). The defendant’s sentence shall be corrected to reflect the appropriate credit.

Order reversed, cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of Jupiter v. Village of Tequesta
713 So. 2d 429 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
713 So. 2d 429, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 598, 1998 WL 28090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.