White v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

White v. Goord

15 A.D.3d 795, 790 N.Y.S.2d 275, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1894

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 15 A.D.3d 795 (White v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Goord, 15 A.D.3d 795, 790 N.Y.S.2d 275, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Fetitioner commenced this CFLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit harassment, impersonation and facility correspondence violations. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot {see Matter of Messer v Selsky, 295 AD2d 664 [2002]).

[796]*796Her cure, J.E, Feters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Fetitioner commenced this CFLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit harassment, impersonation and facility correspondence violations. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot {see Matter of Messer v Selsky, 295 AD2d 664 [2002]).

[796]*796Her cure, J.E, Feters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.3d 795, 790 N.Y.S.2d 275, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-goord-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack