White v. Goord

15 A.D.3d 795, 790 N.Y.S.2d 275, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1894
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 2005·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Fetitioner commenced this CFLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit harassment, impersonation and facility correspondence violations. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot {see Matter of Messer v Selsky, 295 AD2d 664 [2002]).

[796] Her cure, J.E, Feters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Goord, 15 A.D.3d 795, 790 N.Y.S.2d 275, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

15 A.D.3d 795 (White v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stephens v. Goord
19 A.D.3d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Singh v. Eagen
19 A.D.3d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Sheils v. Selsky
19 A.D.3d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Raqiyb v. Goord
18 A.D.3d 1048 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)