Raqiyb v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Raqiyb v. Goord

18 A.D.3d 1048, 794 N.Y.S.2d 696, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5436

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.D.3d 1048 (Raqiyb v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raqiyb v. Goord, 18 A.D.3d 1048, 794 N.Y.S.2d 696, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review four determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging four determinations finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determinations at issue have been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of White v Goord, 15 AD3d 795 [2005]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review four determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging four determinations finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determinations at issue have been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of White v Goord, 15 AD3d 795 [2005]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.3d 1048, 794 N.Y.S.2d 696, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raqiyb-v-goord-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack