Singh v. Eagen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Singh v. Eagen

19 A.D.3d 848, 796 N.Y.S.2d 742, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6745

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 A.D.3d 848 (Singh v. Eagen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singh v. Eagen, 19 A.D.3d 848, 796 N.Y.S.2d 742, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered September 15, 2004 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, to review a determination of the Central Office Review Committee denying his grievance.

Fetitioner commenced this CFLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the Centred Office Review Committee’s denial of his [849]*849grievance in which he protested the recommendation that he participate in a residential substance abuse treatment program. The recommendation was based on erroneous information in his records that he was under the influence of marihuana at the time of his arrest. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that petitioner’s request to have the erroneous information expunged from his records has been granted and that it has since been determined that petitioner is not in need of substance abuse treatment. As petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the appeal is dismissed as moot (see Matter of White v Goord, 15 AD3d 795, 795-796 [2005]; Matter of Cliff v Reams, 271 AD2d 766, 766-767 [2000]).

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered September 15, 2004 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, to review a determination of the Central Office Review Committee denying his grievance.

Fetitioner commenced this CFLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the Centred Office Review Committee’s denial of his [849]*849grievance in which he protested the recommendation that he participate in a residential substance abuse treatment program. The recommendation was based on erroneous information in his records that he was under the influence of marihuana at the time of his arrest. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that petitioner’s request to have the erroneous information expunged from his records has been granted and that it has since been determined that petitioner is not in need of substance abuse treatment. As petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the appeal is dismissed as moot (see Matter of White v Goord, 15 AD3d 795, 795-796 [2005]; Matter of Cliff v Reams, 271 AD2d 766, 766-767 [2000]).

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 848, 796 N.Y.S.2d 742, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singh-v-eagen-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack