Whidby v. Feagins

121 S.E.2d 41, 103 Ga. App. 857, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 1076
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 1961
Docket38735
StatusPublished

This text of 121 S.E.2d 41 (Whidby v. Feagins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whidby v. Feagins, 121 S.E.2d 41, 103 Ga. App. 857, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 1076 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Nichols, Judge.

The decision in this case is controlled adversely to the contentions of the plaintiff in error by the decision in the case of Braziel v. Hunter, ante.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Judges concur. Felton, C. J., and Bell, Hall and Eberhardt, JJ., concurring specially. We concur in the judgment in this case for the sole reason that we are bound by the ruling in the Braziel case. [858]*858Decided April 10, 1961 Rehearing denied June 15, 1961. Joseph E. Cheeley, Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, James B. Hiers, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Merritt & Pruitt, Glyndon C. Pruitt, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 S.E.2d 41, 103 Ga. App. 857, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 1076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whidby-v-feagins-gactapp-1961.