Whidby v. Feagins

121 S.E.2d 41, 103 Ga. App. 857, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 1076

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Whidby v. Feagins. Read the opinion of the Court — 103 Ga. App. 797 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 10, 1961·No. 38735·Published

Opinion

Nichols, Judge.

The decision in this case is controlled adversely to the contentions of the plaintiff in error by the decision in the case of Braziel v. Hunter, ante.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Judges concur. Felton, C. J., and Bell, Hall and Eberhardt, JJ., concurring specially. We concur in the judgment in this case for the sole reason that we are bound by the ruling in the Braziel case. [858]*858Decided April 10, 1961 Rehearing denied June 15, 1961. Joseph E. Cheeley, Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, James B. Hiers, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Merritt & Pruitt, Glyndon C. Pruitt, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, Judge.

The decision in this case is controlled adversely to the contentions of the plaintiff in error by the decision in the case of Braziel v. Hunter, ante.

Judgment affirmed.

Whidby v. Feagins, 121 S.E.2d 41, 103 Ga. App. 857, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 1076 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

121 S.E.2d 41 (Whidby v. Feagins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.