Groves v. Groves

171 S.E. 261, 177 Ga. 768, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 420
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 12, 1933
DocketNo. 9689
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 171 S.E. 261 (Groves v. Groves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Groves v. Groves, 171 S.E. 261, 177 Ga. 768, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 420 (Ga. 1933).

Opinion

IIill, J.

A brief of tlie evidence is essentially a part of a valid motion for new trial. Consequently, where a motion for new trial was filed and no brief of the evidence was presented, the court did not err in dismiss[769]*769ing the motion. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6082, 6306; Baker v. Johnson, 99 Ga. 374 (27 S. E. 706); Mize v. Americus Mfg. &c. Co., 106 Ga. 140 (32 S. E. 22) ; Sewell v. Sewell, 148 Ga. 473 (96 S. E. 1037).

No. 9689. October 12, 1933. William T. Bay and Fred A. Gillen, for plaintiff in error. Wolver M. Smith, Glande Mehaffey, and Jalee B. Joel, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices conowr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whidby v. Feagins
120 S.E.2d 661 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
McDonald v. Wimpy
46 S.E.2d 906 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)
Powell v. Weeks
183 S.E. 75 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 S.E. 261, 177 Ga. 768, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groves-v-groves-ga-1933.