Groves v. Groves

Supreme Court of Georgia

Groves v. Groves

171 S.E. 261, 177 Ga. 768, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 420

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 12, 1933·No. No. 9689·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

IIill, J.

A brief of tlie evidence is essentially a part of a valid motion for new trial. Consequently, where a motion for new trial was filed and no brief of the evidence was presented, the court did not err in dismiss[769]*769ing the motion. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6082, 6306; Baker v. Johnson, 99 Ga. 374 (27 S. E. 706); Mize v. Americus Mfg. &c. Co., 106 Ga. 140 (32 S. E. 22) ; Sewell v. Sewell, 148 Ga. 473 (96 S. E. 1037).

No. 9689. October 12, 1933. William T. Bay and Fred A. Gillen, for plaintiff in error. Wolver M. Smith, Glande Mehaffey, and Jalee B. Joel, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices conowr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IIill, J.

A brief of tlie evidence is essentially a part of a valid motion for new trial. Consequently, where a motion for new trial was filed and no brief of the evidence was presented, the court did not err in dismiss[769]*769ing the motion. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6082, 6306; Baker v. Johnson, 99 Ga. 374 (27 S. E. 706); Mize v. Americus Mfg. &c. Co., 106 Ga. 140 (32 S. E. 22) ; Sewell v. Sewell, 148 Ga. 473 (96 S. E. 1037).

No. 9689. October 12, 1933. William T. Bay and Fred A. Gillen, for plaintiff in error. Wolver M. Smith, Glande Mehaffey, and Jalee B. Joel, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices conowr.

Groves v. Groves, 171 S.E. 261, 177 Ga. 768, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 420 (Ga. 1933).

Pincite

171 S.E. 261 (Groves v. Groves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related