Wheeler v. State

691 So. 2d 1206, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4155, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1014
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wheeler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 690 So. 2d 1369
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 1997·No. No. 96-1140·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Wheeler was convicted of grand theft; dealing in stolen property; attempting to procure title on a stolen vessel; possession of a stolen, forged or unlawfully obtained title, or bill of sale; and obtaining money by means of stolen, forged or unlawfully obtained title or bill of sale. Because the evidence at trial was insufficient to support any of these convictions, the defendant’s motions for judgment of acquittal should have been granted. See Cooper v. State, 82 Fla. 365, 90 So. 375 (1921); Uber v. State, 382 So.2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Wilcox v. State, 183 So.2d 555 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Rosengarten v. State, 166 So.2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to discharge the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler v. State, 691 So. 2d 1206, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4155, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1014 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

691 So. 2d 1206 (Wheeler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Uber v. State
382 So. 2d 1321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Wilcox v. State
183 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Cooper v. State
90 So. 375 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)
Rosengarten v. State
166 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)