Wheeler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wheeler v. State

662 So. 2d 1009, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12190, 1995 WL 676115

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 14, 1995

DocketNo. 94-877

StatusPublished

This text of 662 So. 2d 1009 (Wheeler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheeler v. State, 662 So. 2d 1009, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12190, 1995 WL 676115 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from appellant Wheeler’s convictions for, inter alia, DUI manslaughter and vehicular homicide, both arising from a single death. We must vacate the judgment of conviction for vehicular homicide (the lesser of the two offenses) and remand with directions that the trial court correct the record effectuating same. State v. Chapman, 625 So.2d 838 (Fla.1993); Odom v. State, 632 So.2d 731 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). No resentencing is necessary, as the trial court explicitly waived sentencing Wheeler for vehicular homicide. We affirm the judgment and sentence in all other respects.

VACATED in part; AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED with directions.

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from appellant Wheeler’s convictions for, inter alia, DUI manslaughter and vehicular homicide, both arising from a single death. We must vacate the judgment of conviction for vehicular homicide (the lesser of the two offenses) and remand with directions that the trial court correct the record effectuating same. State v. Chapman, 625 So.2d 838 (Fla.1993); Odom v. State, 632 So.2d 731 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). No resentencing is necessary, as the trial court explicitly waived sentencing Wheeler for vehicular homicide. We affirm the judgment and sentence in all other respects.

VACATED in part; AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED with directions.

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

662 So. 2d 1009, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12190, 1995 WL 676115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack