Odom v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Odom v. State

632 So. 2d 731, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1774, 1994 WL 68324

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 9, 1994

DocketNo. 92-2787

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 632 So. 2d 731 (Odom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Odom v. State, 632 So. 2d 731, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1774, 1994 WL 68324 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Odom brings this appeal from his judgments of conviction and sentences for two counts of DUI manslaughter and two counts of vehicular homicide arising from a single automobile accident which resulted in two deaths. In light of the supreme court’s recent decision in State v. Chapman, 625 So.2d 838 (Fla.1993), we must vacate the judgments of conviction and sentences as to the two counts of vehicular homicide. We remand with directions to the trial court to correct the record effectuating same. No resentenc-ing is necessary and appellant need not be present upon remand. We affirm the judgments of conviction and sentences as to both counts of DUI manslaughter. Odom’s second point on appeal is affirmed without comment.

VACATED in part; AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED.

BOOTH, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Odom brings this appeal from his judgments of conviction and sentences for two counts of DUI manslaughter and two counts of vehicular homicide arising from a single automobile accident which resulted in two deaths. In light of the supreme court’s recent decision in State v. Chapman, 625 So.2d 838 (Fla.1993), we must vacate the judgments of conviction and sentences as to the two counts of vehicular homicide. We remand with directions to the trial court to correct the record effectuating same. No resentenc-ing is necessary and appellant need not be present upon remand. We affirm the judgments of conviction and sentences as to both counts of DUI manslaughter. Odom’s second point on appeal is affirmed without comment.

VACATED in part; AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED.

BOOTH, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

632 So. 2d 731, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1774, 1994 WL 68324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack