Odom v. State
645 So. 2d 1107, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11526, 1994 WL 668260
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Odom v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1774 →
Opinion
We dismiss appellant Odom’s direct appeal on the authority of Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979) (setting forth issues that may be raised on direct appeal from a no-contest plea in absence of express reservation of right to appeal), Kearney v. State, 579 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), and Stewart v. State, 586 So.2d 449 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). See § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1989); Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Odom v. State, 645 So. 2d 1107, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11526, 1994 WL 668260 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
645 So. 2d 1107 (Odom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kearney v. State
579 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Stewart v. State
586 So. 2d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)