Wheeler v. State

744 So. 2d 533, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13667, 1999 WL 821015
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wheeler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 690 So. 2d 1369
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1999·No. No. 99-924·Published

Opinions

ANTOON, C.J.

Gary Wheeler appeals his sentence which was imposed by the trial court after he pled guilty to violating his probation. At sentencing, the trial court ordered that Mr. Wheeler was to receive credit for the time he served under his original sentence stating that “[t]he Department of Corrections will apply that credit.” The trial court then directed the Department of Corrections to calculate and apply that credit. Mr. Wheeler’s sentencing documents properly reflect this ruling. Accordingly, we affirm because the trial court’s ruling was not erroneous. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.986(d). Cf. Williams v. State, 727 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Cosgrave v. State, 656 So.2d 281 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Bacon v. State, 647 So.2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, J., concurs. HARRIS, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler v. State, 744 So. 2d 533, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13667, 1999 WL 821015 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

744 So. 2d 533 (Wheeler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bacon v. State
647 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Green v. State
636 So. 2d 830 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Wilson v. State
603 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cosgrave v. State
656 So. 2d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Williams v. State
727 So. 2d 1095 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)