Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States

2015 CIT 118
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 F. Supp. 3d 1372
United States Court of International Trade·Decided October 22, 2015·No. Consol. 12-00296·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 15-118

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

WHEATLAND TUBE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v. Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge UNITED STATES, Consol. Court No. 12-00296 Defendant.

JUDGMENT

Before the court is the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) Final

Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Oct. 13, 2015), ECF No. 52 (“Remand

Results”) in this action. In the Remand Results, Commerce “found no basis for making an

adjustment” to the antidumping duty rates for circular welded pipe imported from China

to account for the impact of the countervailing duty order on the same merchandise.

Remand Results at 6. All parties agree that the Remand Results comply with the court’s

instructions and should be sustained. Joint Status Report 1-2 (Oct. 19, 2015), ECF No.

54.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained.

/s/ Leo M. Gordon Judge Leo M. Gordon

Dated: October 22, 2015 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, 2015 CIT 118 (cit 2015).

2015 CIT 118 (Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.