Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States

102 F. Supp. 3d 1380, 37 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2311, 2015 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 118, 2015 WL 6387362
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 F. Supp. 3d 1372
United States Court of International Trade·Decided October 22, 2015·No. Slip Op. 15-118; Court No. 12-00296·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

LEO M. GORDON, Judge.

Before the court is the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). Final Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand [1381]*1381(Oct. 13, 2015), EOF No. 52 (“Remand Results ”) in this action. In the Remand Results, Commerce “found no basis for making an adjustment” to the antidumping duty rates for circular welded pipe imported from China to account for the impact of the countervailing duty order on the same merchandise. Remand Results at 6. All parties agree that the Remand Results comply with the court’s instructions and should be sustained. Joint Status Report 1-2 (Oct. 19, 2015), ECF No. 54.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, 102 F. Supp. 3d 1380, 37 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2311, 2015 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 118, 2015 WL 6387362 (cit 2015).

102 F. Supp. 3d 1380 (Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.