Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States
Opinion
Slip Op 18-85
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
WHEATLAND TUBE CO.,
Plaintiff,
Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge v.
UNITED STATES, Court No. 17-00021 Defendant.
JUDGMENT
Before the court is the U.S. Department of Commerce's (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand ("Remand Results"), ECF No. 37, in this action. The court notes that it “erred in remanding” the issue of Commerce’s treatment of the cost of caps used by the mandatory respondent “without ascertaining whether [the issue] had a material effect on the less than fair value determinations. As Commerce explains in the Remand Results, [this issue does not,] and any error was therefore harmless. It was therefore a waste of administrative resources for the court to require a remand in this case.” See CC Metals & Alloys, LLC v. United States, 41 CIT ___, ___, 222 F. Supp. 3d 1303, 1304 (2017). There being no challenge to the Remand Results, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained.
/s/ Leo M. Gordon
Judge Leo M. Gordon
Dated: July 9, 2018 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2018 CIT 85 (Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.