Weyhrauch v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weyhrauch v. Miller

240 A.D. 863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 240 A.D. 863 (Weyhrauch v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weyhrauch v. Miller, 240 A.D. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. The complaint does not state a cause of action against the hospital and, therefore, the examination should not have been authorized. (Schloendorff v. New York Hospital, 211 N. Y. 125; Matter of Renouf v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 254 id. 349; Mieryjeski v. Bay Ridge Sanitarium, Inc., 237 App. Div. 851.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. The complaint does not state a cause of action against the hospital and, therefore, the examination should not have been authorized. (Schloendorff v. New York Hospital, 211 N. Y. 125; Matter of Renouf v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 254 id. 349; Mieryjeski v. Bay Ridge Sanitarium, Inc., 237 App. Div. 851.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weyhrauch-v-miller-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack