Mieryjeski v. Bay Ridge Sanitarium, Inc.

237 A.D. 851
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 237 A.D. 851 (Mieryjeski v. Bay Ridge Sanitarium, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mieryjeski v. Bay Ridge Sanitarium, Inc., 237 A.D. 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The defendant corporation may not be examined through the individuals named in the notice because they are not managing agents or employees of the defendant so far as the matters set out in the complaint and the notice of examination are concerned. (Schloendorff v. New York Hospital, 211 N. Y. 125; Matter of Renouf v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 254 id. 349.) The case of Robertson v. Towns Hospital (178 App. Div. 285) must be deemed overruled by the Benouf ease. The subject-matter of the examination concerns acts of defendant’s employees other than administrative acts and, therefore, may not be made the subject of an examination in the cause of action set out herein. The disposition herein is without prejudice to an application for a discovery of hospital records if a proper basis therefor can be shown. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Veneri v. Mount Vernon Hospital
2 Misc. 2d 1063 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Bakal v. University Heights Sanitarium, Inc.
277 A.D.2d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Gerke v. City of New York
187 Misc. 911 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Lee v. Glens Falls Hospital
265 A.D. 607 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
Steinert v. Brunswick Home, Inc.
259 A.D. 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Post v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.
173 Misc. 250 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)
Steinert v. Brunswick Home, Inc.
172 Misc. 787 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Yohalem v. Yasuna
165 Misc. 435 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1937)
Kamps v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.
251 A.D. 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Hendrickson v. Hodkin
250 A.D. 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Daly's Astoria Sanatorium, Inc. v. Blair
161 Misc. 716 (New York City Court, 1936)
Weyhrauch v. Miller
240 A.D. 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 A.D. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mieryjeski-v-bay-ridge-sanitarium-inc-nyappdiv-1932.