Weyhrauch v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weyhrauch v. Miller

242 A.D. 641

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weyhrauch v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 A.D. 863 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order, so far as it grants plaintiff’s cross-motion for leave to serve a further amended complaint, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s cross-motion denied, without costs. In our opinion, there is no difference in substance between the proposed amended complaint and the former amended complaint, held by this court to be defective. (Weyhrauch v. Miller, 240 App. Div. 863.) Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Seudder, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as it grants plaintiff’s cross-motion for leave to serve a further amended complaint, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s cross-motion denied, without costs. In our opinion, there is no difference in substance between the proposed amended complaint and the former amended complaint, held by this court to be defective. (Weyhrauch v. Miller, 240 App. Div. 863.) Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Seudder, J., dissents.

Weyhrauch v. Miller, 242 A.D. 641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 641 (Weyhrauch v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related