Weser v. Glen

Second Circuit

Weser v. Glen

41 F. App'x 521

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedAugust 15, 2002

DocketDocket No. 01-9251

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 41 F. App'x 521 (Weser v. Glen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weser v. Glen, 41 F. App'x 521 (2d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-Appellant Rubin George Weser appeals from the judgment entered in the United States District Court for the East[522]*522ern District of New York (Dearie, J.) granting defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm because Weser has failed to identify any error or abuse of discretion by the district court that warrants reversal or remand.

The judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-Appellant Rubin George Weser appeals from the judgment entered in the United States District Court for the East[522]*522ern District of New York (Dearie, J.) granting defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm because Weser has failed to identify any error or abuse of discretion by the district court that warrants reversal or remand.

The judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 F. App'x 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weser-v-glen-ca2-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack