Werley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Werley v. State

208 So. 3d 832, 2017 WL 280897, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 629

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D15-2628·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the order revoking probation and the sentence that followed. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written order. The court’s oral pronouncement found appellant committed two crimes in violation of one probation condition; whereas the written order found he violated several conditions, The trial court should amend the written order to comport with its oral pronouncement. See Kemp v. State, 135 So.3d 347 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

OSTERHAUS, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the order revoking probation and the sentence that followed. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written order. The court’s oral pronouncement found appellant committed two crimes in violation of one probation condition; whereas the written order found he violated several conditions, The trial court should amend the written order to comport with its oral pronouncement. See Kemp v. State, 135 So.3d 347 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

OSTERHAUS, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ„ CONCUR.

Werley v. State, 208 So. 3d 832, 2017 WL 280897, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 629 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

208 So. 3d 832 (Werley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related