Sesco v. State

254 So. 3d 1196
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 2018
DocketNo. 1D18-0725
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 So. 3d 1196 (Sesco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sesco v. State, 254 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to enter a corrected order of revocation of probation reflecting, consistent with its oral pronouncement, that the revocation was based only on the new law offense violations of driving while license suspended, battery on a law enforcement officer, and resisting officer without violence. See Werley v. State , 208 So.3d 832 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). Appellant need not be present.

Wolf, Lewis, and Rowe, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tony Lamar Castro v. State of Florida
275 So. 3d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 So. 3d 1196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sesco-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.