Tony Lamar Castro v. State of Florida

275 So. 3d 250
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 9, 2019
Docket18-3679
StatusPublished

This text of 275 So. 3d 250 (Tony Lamar Castro v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tony Lamar Castro v. State of Florida, 275 So. 3d 250 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-3679 _____________________________

TONY LAMAR CASTRO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

July 9, 2019

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm the judgment, sentences, and the order revoking Appellant’s probation. However, we remand for the entry of a corrected probation revocation order that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncement that revocation was based only upon Appellant’s new law offenses. See Thomas v. State, 255 So. 3d 997, 997 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (affirming the revocation of probation and sentence but remanding for entry of a corrected revocation order that conformed to the trial court’s oral pronouncement); Sesco v. State, 254 So. 3d 1196, 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (affirming the revocation of probation and sentence but remanding for the trial court to enter a corrected revocation order reflecting, consistent with its oral pronouncement, that the revocation was based only on the new law offenses); Ross v. State, 212 So. 3d 1149, 1150 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (affirming the revocation of probation and sentences but remanding for entry of a corrected revocation order that conformed to the trial court’s oral pronouncement).

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Ross v. State
212 So. 3d 1149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Sesco v. State
254 So. 3d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Thomas v. State
255 So. 3d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 So. 3d 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tony-lamar-castro-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.