Travis Dean Sesco v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2018·No. 18-0725·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D18-0725

TRAVIS DEAN SESCO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. John F. Simon, Judge.

October 18, 2018

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to enter a corrected order of revocation of probation reflecting, consistent with its oral pronouncement, that the revocation was based only on the new law offense violations of driving while license suspended, battery on a law enforcement officer, and resisting officer without violence. See Werley v. State, 208 So. 3d 832 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). Appellant need not be present.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Travis Dean Sesco v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Travis Dean Sesco v. State of Florida (Travis Dean Sesco v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Werley v. State
208 So. 3d 832 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)