Weiss v. Miami National Bank
This text of 320 So. 2d 466 (Weiss v. Miami National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stephen WEISS, Appellant,
v.
MIAMI NATIONAL BANK, a National Banking Association, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Thomas A. Groendyke, of Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Ray H. Pearson and Dennis L. Webb, of Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Proenza & Richman, Miami, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the record on appeal and after consideration of the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the respective parties, we determine that the order entitled "Partial Summary Judgment and Ruling on Other Pending Motions" bearing date March 6, 1975 is void, the order having been entered by the judge subsequent to his disqualification herein. Accordingly, the order appealed is vacated and set aside as a nullity, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 So. 2d 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-miami-national-bank-fladistctapp-1975.