Schwartz v. Schwartz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schwartz v. Schwartz

427 So. 2d 232, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20252

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 1983

DocketNo. 82-563

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 427 So. 2d 232 (Schwartz v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Schwartz, 427 So. 2d 232, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20252 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The amount of permanent periodic alimony is excessive in the light of the evidence concerning the husband’s ability to pay, Parham v. Parham, 385 So.2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Blum v. Blum, 382 So.2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); the cause is therefore remanded solely for the trial court to determine a reasonable, substantially lower award. The judgment under review is otherwise entirely affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The amount of permanent periodic alimony is excessive in the light of the evidence concerning the husband’s ability to pay, Parham v. Parham, 385 So.2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Blum v. Blum, 382 So.2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); the cause is therefore remanded solely for the trial court to determine a reasonable, substantially lower award. The judgment under review is otherwise entirely affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

427 So. 2d 232, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-schwartz-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack