State Ex Rel. Cobb v. Bailey

349 So. 2d 849
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 19, 1977
DocketHH-68
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 349 So. 2d 849 (State Ex Rel. Cobb v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Cobb v. Bailey, 349 So. 2d 849 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

349 So.2d 849 (1977)

STATE of Florida ex rel. Glenwood Brooks COBB, Sr., Relator,
v.
The Honorable W.L. BAILEY, As Circuit Judge of the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. HH-68.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 19, 1977.

*850 Bill A. Corbin Law Offices, P.A., Blountstown, for relator.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Douglas C. Kearney, and Joseph W. Lawrence, II, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

SMITH, Judge.

We issued a rule nisi in prohibition on relator's showing that the respondent circuit judge, having recused himself from consideration of the dissolution issues in this case of marital strife, improperly proceeded to hear and determine the wife's motion for contempt process against relator. Respondent has filed a return to the rule and we have considered the case on briefs and a transcript of the circuit court's proceedings. The respondent circuit judge, sensitive to an appearance of impropriety in his consideration of emotional issues between parties with whom the judge had social and business relations for "quite a long time," invited an oral suggestion for recusal, which relator made, and recused himself from consideration of the case. The court reserved power, however, to act immediately on imminent questions of temporary alimony and child support and temporary use and possession of an automobile and household items. While relator acquiesced in the court's retention of limited jurisdiction, relator affirmatively objected when, nearly four weeks later, the respondent judge undertook disposition of the wife's petition that relator be held in contempt for disobedience to the court's order temporarily regulating the parties' property affairs pending a full hearing before another judge.

We consider that the respondent judge's recusal order effectively deprived that judge of authority to preside in the contempt proceedings. In these circumstances, the trial court's order temporarily fixing the parties' obligations pending final hearing may stand, but the wife's petition for contempt proceedings should have been and must now be referred to another circuit judge. A recusal entered on informal motion in lieu of formal disqualification proceedings ends the judge's power to take part in the disposition of the case. Gilmer v. Shell Oil Co., 324 So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). The contempt order is vacated and a writ of prohibition will issue.

MILLS, Acting C.J., and ERVIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plaza v. Plaza
21 So. 3d 181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Southern Coatings, Inc. v. City of Tamarac
840 So. 2d 1109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Johnson v. District Court In & For the County of Jefferson
674 P.2d 952 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1984)
Johnson v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR JEFFERSON
674 P.2d 952 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1984)
Schwartz v. Schwartz
431 So. 2d 716 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
378 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
349 So. 2d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cobb-v-bailey-fladistctapp-1977.