Armbrister v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Armbrister v. State

320 So. 2d 466, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15453

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 21, 1975

DocketNo. 75-212

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 320 So. 2d 466 (Armbrister v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armbrister v. State, 320 So. 2d 466, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Mervin Armbrister, seeks reversal of a judgment of conviction based [467]*467upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the second degree. He was sentenced to life imprisonment.

Appellant’s sole point on appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error in permitting, over appellant’s objection, the testimony of a custodian of records of the Dade County Public Safety Department, who had not been listed by name but only by job title in response to a request for discovery pursuant to Rule 3.-220 F.R.C.P.

We have carefully considered appellant’s point on appeal in the light of the record and the controlling principles of law and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Richardson v. State, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 771; Savinon v. State, Fla.App.1973, 277 So.2d 58.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI