Wayne McCollum v. James E. Bush

344 F.2d 672, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5668
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 1965
Docket21819
StatusPublished
Cited by51 cases

This text of 344 F.2d 672 (Wayne McCollum v. James E. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wayne McCollum v. James E. Bush, 344 F.2d 672, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5668 (5th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Upon careful consideration, we find ourselves in agreement with nearly all of the thorough and able opinion of the district judge. While we think that the opinion of a general medical practitioner as to sanity is admissible, it seems clear to us, under the facts and circumstances of this case, that in adjudicating Bush guilty and sentencing him to life imprisonment without any psychiatric testimony, 1 the state denied Bush both a fair trial and the effective assistance of counsel. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

1

. The only psychiatric testimony given on behalf of the appellee was that of a clinical psychologist who was required to examine Bush during a 40 minute lunch recess during the trial. It is relevant to note that when the appellee was subjected to a real psychiatric examination following remand by the United States Supreme Court, Bush v. State of Texas, 372 U.S. 586, 83 S.Ct. 922, 9 L.Ed.2d 958, he was kept at the state mental hospital for treatment and observation for 89 days — thus dramatically highlighting the inadequacy of the 40 minute lunch hour period granted to the appellee’s psychologist at the trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Freece v. State
848 S.W.2d 150 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Magwood v. Smith
791 F.2d 1438 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
State v. Campbell
498 A.2d 330 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1985)
State v. Jenkins
473 N.E.2d 264 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1984)
Lester Matlock v. James Rose, Warden
731 F.2d 1236 (Sixth Circuit, 1984)
Volanty v. State
663 S.W.2d 897 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Alvord v. Wainwright
564 F. Supp. 459 (M.D. Florida, 1983)
State v. Carter
641 S.W.2d 54 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1982)
Ronald Wayne Bradbury v. Louie L. Wainwright
658 F.2d 1083 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Blake v. Zant
513 F. Supp. 772 (S.D. Georgia, 1981)
Charles William Hoback v. State of Alabama
607 F.2d 680 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
James G. Davis v. State of Alabama
596 F.2d 1214 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
Roberts v. State
373 N.E.2d 1103 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1978)
Springer v. Collins
444 F. Supp. 1049 (D. Maryland, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 F.2d 672, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayne-mccollum-v-james-e-bush-ca5-1965.