Wayne McCollum v. James E. Bush
This text of 344 F.2d 672 (Wayne McCollum v. James E. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon careful consideration, we find ourselves in agreement with nearly all of the thorough and able opinion of the district judge. While we think that the opinion of a general medical practitioner as to sanity is admissible, it seems clear to us, under the facts and circumstances of this case, that in adjudicating Bush guilty and sentencing him to life imprisonment without any psychiatric testimony, 1 the state denied Bush both a fair trial and the effective assistance of counsel. The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
. The only psychiatric testimony given on behalf of the appellee was that of a clinical psychologist who was required to examine Bush during a 40 minute lunch recess during the trial. It is relevant to note that when the appellee was subjected to a real psychiatric examination following remand by the United States Supreme Court, Bush v. State of Texas, 372 U.S. 586, 83 S.Ct. 922, 9 L.Ed.2d 958, he was kept at the state mental hospital for treatment and observation for 89 days — thus dramatically highlighting the inadequacy of the 40 minute lunch hour period granted to the appellee’s psychologist at the trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
344 F.2d 672, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wayne-mccollum-v-james-e-bush-ca5-1965.