Watson v. State

562 So. 2d 415, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4138, 1990 WL 77404
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Watson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 528 So. 2d 101
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 7, 1990·No. No. 90-181·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in denying Watson’s motion to suppress. The facts in this record fail to demonstrate that the police officers had a founded, reasonable suspicion that Watson had committed, was committing, or was about to commit a criminal violation at the time they detained and searched him. The articulated “suspicion” that Watson may have' stolen the radio he had been seen carrying amounts to nothing more than speculation on this record. As the detention and search was not made in conformance with the requirements of section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989), e.g., Mosley v. State, 519 So.2d 58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), the conviction is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to discharge Watson.

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 562 So. 2d 415, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4138, 1990 WL 77404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

562 So. 2d 415 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mosley v. State
519 So. 2d 58 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)