Watson v. State

510 So. 2d 374, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1886, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Watson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 528 So. 2d 101
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1987·No. No. 85-1579·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to Point 1 and the merits. We reverse as to Point 2 because the trial court erred in imposing costs against appellant in a criminal case where appellant had been adjudicated insolvent and where appellant was not first provided with an opportunity to object to the costs. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). We remand for a new hearing upon the issue of costs. In the alternative, considering the costs to the state and other exigencies associated with the above mentioned hearing procedure, the State of Florida is free to elect to forego the imposition of such costs against appellant.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 510 So. 2d 374, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1886, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9702 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

510 So. 2d 374 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)