Watson v. State
Opinion
Where the defendant failed to request an instruction on simple possession of cocaine as a lesser included offense of trafficking in cocaine, and asked instead only for the “standard jury instructions” notwithstanding the trial court’s repeated inquiry as to whether she wanted additional instructions, there was no reversible error.1 See State v. Daophin, 533 So.2d 761 (FIa.1988) (simple possession is not a necessarily lesser included offense of trafficking). The evidence showed that the amount of cocaine possessed by the defendant exceeded the 400 grams amount necessary to a trafficking conviction.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
533 So. 2d 932 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.