Watson v. State

533 So. 2d 932, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2579, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5118, 1988 WL 123798
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Watson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 528 So. 2d 101
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 1988·No. No. 88-501·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Where the defendant failed to request an instruction on simple possession of cocaine as a lesser included offense of trafficking in cocaine, and asked instead only for the “standard jury instructions” notwithstanding the trial court’s repeated inquiry as to whether she wanted additional instructions, there was no reversible error.1 See State v. Daophin, 533 So.2d 761 (FIa.1988) (simple possession is not a necessarily lesser included offense of trafficking). The evidence showed that the amount of cocaine possessed by the defendant exceeded the 400 grams amount necessary to a trafficking conviction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 533 So. 2d 932, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2579, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5118, 1988 WL 123798 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

533 So. 2d 932 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Daophin
533 So. 2d 761 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Florida Bar Re Standard Jury Instructions—Criminal
508 So. 2d 1221 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)