Watson v. Alta Investment Co.
This text of 108 P. 50 (Watson v. Alta Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by the intervener, Western Fuel Company, from the judgment in favor of the defendants, and from an order denying its motion for a new *567 trial, and is taken on the same transcript as case No. 701, ante, p. 560, [108 Pac. 48], bearing the same title, which we have this day decided. It grows out of the same transaction, and is argued in and submitted upon the same briefs.
The intervener furnished materials to Watson Bros., the plaintiff’s assignors, to be used in the construction of the building giving rise to the controversy in said case No. 701; and long after the destruction of the building it served notice on the owner, the Alta Investment Company, to withhold any moneys that might be due by it to defendant Crichton. But we have this day affirmed the judgment of the lower court in favor of defendants Alta Investment Company and Crichton, by which it was adjudged that there was nothing due from said company.
For the reasons stated in the opinion in said case No. 701 for affirming the judgment and order in that case, the judgment and order in this case should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
Hall, J., and Cooper, P. J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on April 7, 1910.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 P. 50, 12 Cal. App. 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-alta-investment-co-calctapp-1910.