Waters v. Key Colony East, Inc.

345 So. 2d 367
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 1977
Docket76-835
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 345 So. 2d 367 (Waters v. Key Colony East, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waters v. Key Colony East, Inc., 345 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

345 So.2d 367 (1977)

George P. WATERS and Charles F. Duchein, Appellants,
v.
KEY COLONY EAST, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 76-835.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 19, 1977.
Rehearing Denied May 23, 1977.

Horan & Finley, Key West, for appellants.

A.M. Schwitalla, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge refused to return a down payment or deposit to a prospective purchaser under a deposit receipt contract involving real property, and refused to award the seller damages beyond the sum fixed as liquidated damages under the agreement. We affirm.

A party to a contract cannot take advantage of his own wrongdoing to avoid responsibility thereunder. Walker v. Chancey, 96 Fla. 82, 117 So. 705 (1928); Chatlos v. Morse Auto Rentals, Inc., 183 So.2d 854 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1966); Ballard v. El Dorado Tire Company, 512 F.2d 901 (5th Cir.1975); 7 Fla.Jur., Contracts, §§ 147, 148. A party to a contract, who agrees to accept a sum as liquidated damages, cannot sue for actual damages. Stone, Sand & Gravel Company v. United States, 234 U.S. 270, 34 S.Ct. 865, *368 58 L.Ed. 1308 (1914); Coca-Cola Bottling Works (Thomas) Inc. v. Hazard Coca-Cola Bottling Works, Inc., 450 S.W.2d 515 (Ct. App.Ky. 1970); Ashley v. Lance, 80 Wash.2d 274, 493 P.2d 1242 (1972); 9A Fla.Jur., Damages, § 115; 22 Am.Jur.2d, Damages, § 235; Cf. Hillsborough County Aviation Authority v. Cone Brothers Contracting Company, 285 So.2d 619 (Fla. 2nd D.C.A. 1973).

Therefore, the final judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BRIDGETTE SHAW v. ZARA NEWHAM
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
Beeper Vibes, Inc. v. Simon Property Group, Inc.
600 F. App'x 314 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
Cullum v. Packo
947 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. v. DelGuidice
790 So. 2d 1158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Metro. Dade Cty. v. Frank J. Rooney
627 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
FLORIDA NAT. BANK v. Bankatlantic
557 So. 2d 596 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Bowers v. Medina
418 So. 2d 1068 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Holston v. Bernal
407 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 So. 2d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waters-v-key-colony-east-inc-fladistctapp-1977.