Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.

569 A.2d 549, 213 Conn. 813, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 34

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJanuary 11, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 569 A.2d 549 (Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc., 569 A.2d 549, 213 Conn. 813, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 34 (Colo. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 283, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that a trial court may properly render judgment beyond the 120 [814]*814day period allowed by Connecticut General Statutes § 51-183b without the waiver or consent of all parties prior to rendition of the judgment?”

Haden P. Gerrish, in support of the petition. Paul L. Bollo, in opposition. Decided January 11, 1990

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 283, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that a trial court may properly render judgment beyond the 120 [814]*814day period allowed by Connecticut General Statutes § 51-183b without the waiver or consent of all parties prior to rendition of the judgment?”

Haden P. Gerrish, in support of the petition. Paul L. Bollo, in opposition. Decided January 11, 1990

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

569 A.2d 549, 213 Conn. 813, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterman-v-united-caribbean-inc-conn-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack