Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.

569 A.2d 549, 213 Conn. 813, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 34

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 11, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 283, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that a trial court may properly render judgment beyond the 120 [814]*814day period allowed by Connecticut General Statutes § 51-183b without the waiver or consent of all parties prior to rendition of the judgment?”

Haden P. Gerrish, in support of the petition. Paul L. Bollo, in opposition. Decided January 11, 1990

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 283, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that a trial court may properly render judgment beyond the 120 [814]*814day period allowed by Connecticut General Statutes § 51-183b without the waiver or consent of all parties prior to rendition of the judgment?”

Haden P. Gerrish, in support of the petition. Paul L. Bollo, in opposition. Decided January 11, 1990

Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc., 569 A.2d 549, 213 Conn. 813, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 34 (Colo. 1990).

Pincite

569 A.2d 549 (Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.

577 A.2d 1047 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)

Opinion

Related