Washington v. Strickland

Fifth Circuit

Washington v. Strickland

679 F.2d 23, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19253

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 1982

Docket81-5379

StatusPublished

This text of 679 F.2d 23 (Washington v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. Strickland, 679 F.2d 23, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19253 (5th Cir. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

679 F.2d 23

David Leroy WASHINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Charles E. STRICKLAND, Superintendent; Jim Smith, Attorney
General, State of Florida; Louie L. Wainwright,
Secretary of Department of Corrections,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 81-5379.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Unit B*

May 14, 1982.

Appeal from United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; C. Clyde Atkins, Chief Judge.

Richard E. Shapiro, New Orleans, La., for petitioner-appellant.

Calvin Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for respondents-appellees.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 23, 1982, 5 Cir., 1982, 673 F.2d 879).

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., HENDERSON, ANDERSON, and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges.**

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

*

Former Fifth Circuit case, Section 9(3) of Public Law 96-452-October 14, 1980

**

Judges Vance and Hatchett are recused and did not participate in this decision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI