Chandler v. United States
This text of 193 F.3d 1297 (Chandler v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David Ronald CHANDLER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 97-6365.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 3, 1999.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Nos. CV 95-8005 and cv CR 90-266); James H. Hancock, Judge.
(October 29, 1999, 11th Cir., 1999, 193 F.3d 1297).
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges*.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en
banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing
en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's
opinion is hereby VACATED.
* Judge Ed Carnes has recused himself and will not participate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 F.3d 1297, 1999 WL 982384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-united-states-ca11-1999.