Dobbs v. Turpin
This text of 142 F.3d 1383 (Dobbs v. Turpin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8244
D. C. Docket No. 4:80-CV-247
WILBURN DOBBS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
A. G. THOMAS, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Georgia
(January 19, 1996)
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, HATCHETT and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This case is remanded to the district court, and the district
court is directed to conduct de novo hearings on all issues
regarding ineffective assistance of counsel in the sentencing phase
of this case. Following hearings, the district court shall make
written findings of fact and conclusions of law. REMANDED 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 F.3d 1383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dobbs-v-turpin-ca11-1998.