Washington v. State

338 S.W.3d 398, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 462
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 5, 2011
DocketNo. WD 72581
StatusPublished

This text of 338 S.W.3d 398 (Washington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington v. State, 338 S.W.3d 398, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 462 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Washington appeals the Circuit Court of Boone County, Missouri’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Washington claims that his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to call Washington to testify at an earlier hearing to suppress his statement [399]*399to the police. We affirm the judgment of the motion court. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 S.W.3d 398, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-state-moctapp-2011.