Washington v. State

338 S.W.3d 398, 2011 WL 1234652
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 2011·No. WD 72581·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

338 S.W.3d 398 (2011)

Malcolm A. WASHINGTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 72581.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 5, 2011.

Mark A. Grothoff, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Division II: KAREN KING MITCHELL, Presiding Judge, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS and VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judges.

Order

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Washington appeals the Circuit Court of Boone County, Missouri's denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Washington claims that his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to call Washington to testify at an earlier hearing to suppress his statement *399 to the police. We affirm the judgment of the motion court. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 338 S.W.3d 398, 2011 WL 1234652 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

338 S.W.3d 398 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boudreau v. Boudreau
338 S.W.3d 398 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)