Washington v. State

307 S.W.3d 228, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 412
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 6, 2010·No. No. ED 93359·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry E. Washington appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 29.151 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to [229]*229Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) Mo. R. Civ. P. 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 307 S.W.3d 228, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 412 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

307 S.W.3d 228 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington v. State
307 S.W.3d 228 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)