Washington v. State

303 S.W.3d 629, 2010 WL 623631
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Washington v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 300 S.W.3d 241
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2010·No. ED 92854·Published

Opinion

303 S.W.3d 629 (2010)

Dennis WASHINGTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 92854.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

February 23, 2010.

Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Christopher Koster, Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before KENNETH M. ROMINES, C.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Washington appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 303 S.W.3d 629, 2010 WL 623631 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

303 S.W.3d 629 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington v. State
303 S.W.3d 629 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)