Washington v. State

689 So. 2d 1298, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2791, 1997 WL 134309
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 1997·No. No. 96-3551·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Appellant’s motion alleging that his counsel was ineffective was not refuted by the exhibits attached to the State’s response and incorporated into the trial court’s order. A claimant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim if he specifies facts, not conclusively rebutted by the record, demonstrating counsel’s deficiency in performance that prejudiced him. Rose v. State, 617 So.2d 291, 296 (Fla.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 903, 114 S.Ct. 279, 126 L.Ed.2d 230 (1993). Therefore, the order denying relief is reversed and remand[1299]*1299ed to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or attachment of further record excerpts.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 689 So. 2d 1298, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2791, 1997 WL 134309 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

689 So. 2d 1298 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington v. State
705 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)