Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation

293 F.3d 242, 2002 WL 1160069
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 2002
Docket00-50139
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 293 F.3d 242 (Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation, 293 F.3d 242, 2002 WL 1160069 (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. and 5th Cir. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge, did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Community Bank & Trust v. United States
54 Fed. Cl. 352 (Federal Claims, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 F.3d 242, 2002 WL 1160069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-legal-foundation-v-texas-equal-access-to-justice-foundation-ca5-2002.