Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation
521 U.S. 1117, 117 S. Ct. 2535
Opinion
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Is interest earned on client trust funds held by lawyers in IOLTA accounts a property interest of the client or lawyer, cognizable under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, despite the fundamental precept of IOLTA that such funds, absent the IOLTA program, could not earn interest for the client or lawyer?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation, 521 U.S. 1117, 117 S. Ct. 2535 (1997).
521 U.S. 1117 (Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation
293 F.3d 242 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Washington Legal Foundation v. Legal Foundation Of Washington
271 F.3d 835 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Washington Legal Foundation v. Legal Foundation
271 F.3d 835 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Washington Leg Fdn v. Texas Equal Access, e
293 F.3d 242 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3296, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4562 Faye Garneau, Edward Garneau, Robert Klepinger, Nicolas Fedan, Richard Ju, Triad Development, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. City of Seattle, a Municipal Corporation, and the Tenants Union, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee
147 F.3d 802 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Garneau v. City of Seattle
147 F.3d 802 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)