Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation

Fifth Circuit

Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation

106 F.3d 640, 1997 WL 63710

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 1997

DocketNo. 95-50160

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 106 F.3d 640 (Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington Legal Foundation v. Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation, 106 F.3d 640, 1997 WL 63710 (5th Cir. 1997).

Pincite

Opinions

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before WISDOM, GARWOOD and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Petitions for Rehearing are DENIED and the court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor, (FRAP and Local Rule 35) the Suggestions for Rehearing En Banc are also DENIED.

POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, WIENER, BENAVIDES, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges, dissent from the refusal of the court to grant rehearing en banc. DENNIS, Circuit Judge, did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI