Ward v. State

11 So. 3d 459, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620, 2009 WL 1675487
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 2009·No. No. 3D05-685·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

SHEPHERD, J.

We consider on remand our opinion in Ward v. State, 965 So.2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), which the Florida Supreme Court quashed following its decision in Ward v. State, 7 So.3d 520 (Fla.2009). As ordered by the supreme court, we apply its decision in Yisrael v. State, 993 So.2d 952 (Fla.2008) (Yisrael II), to the facts of this case.

In Yisrael II, the supreme court disapproved of the holding in Yisrael v. State, 938 So.2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), that a Department of Correction’s letter alone was sufficient evidence to sentence Yisrael as a prison releasee reoffender. See Yisrael II, 993 So.2d at 959. Given the supreme court’s reasoning in Yisrael II, we now reverse Ward’s sentence as a prison releasee reoffender because a Department of Correction’s letter alone is insufficient to support sentencing Ward as a prison releasee reoffender. See id. at 961. We therefore remand for resentencing consistent with the supreme court’s decision in Yisrael II.

Upon remand, the State may present additional evidence to prove that the defendant qualifies for prison releasee reof-fender sentencing. See State v. Collins, 985 So.2d 985, 990 (Fla.2008).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. State, 11 So. 3d 459, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620, 2009 WL 1675487 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

11 So. 3d 459 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CHRISTOPHER TAVARIS DEAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
Christopher Dean v. State of Florida
230 So. 3d 420 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)