Ward v. State
This text of 946 So. 2d 1267 (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because Appellant’s sentence is illegal, we reverse the trial court’s denial and remand for resen-tencing.
The points scored on Appellant’s sentencing scoresheet for prior offenses do not accurately reflect the points warranted by those offenses. We, therefore, reverse and remand for resentencing pursuant to a correctly calculated scoresheet.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
946 So. 2d 1267, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 868, 2007 WL 187891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.