Ward v. State

895 So. 2d 439, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 225, 2005 WL 94520
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 854 So. 2d 260
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 2005·No. No. 1D04-3465·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which the lower court denied a petition for a writ of mandamus. In his petition below the appellant sought to compel the lower court to comply with the mandate which issued in connection with this court’s opinion in Ward v. State, 667 So.2d 231 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), wherein we directed that the judgment and sentence for the appellant’s second degree murder conviction be corrected to show that the appellant was not adjudicated as a habitual offender for that offense. The attachments to the present order denying mandamus indicate that the lower court complied with this court’s mandate shortly after it was issued, and that judgment and sentence were thereafter entered without a habitual offender designation for the second degree murder. The appellant’s petition for a writ of mandamus was therefore properly denied.

In seeking mandamus the appellant referred to documents from the Department of Corrections which appear to still maintain a habitual offender designation for the second degree murder. But this does not negate the lower court’s compliance with our mandate, and the proper avenue of recourse would appear to be for the appellant to pursue the institutional grievance process.

The appealed order is affirmed.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. State, 895 So. 2d 439, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 225, 2005 WL 94520 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

895 So. 2d 439 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. State
667 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)