Ward v. State
844 So. 2d 776, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7022, 2003 WL 21075945
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 2003·No. No. 3D02-358·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for sale of cocaine. We affirm, as the errors alleged are not fundamental and no timely objections were made during the proceedings. This affir-mance is without prejudice to defendant fifing motions for postconviction relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. State, 844 So. 2d 776, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7022, 2003 WL 21075945 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
844 So. 2d 776 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ward v. State
914 So. 2d 982 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)