Ward v. State
875 So. 2d 771, 2004 WL 1362962
Opinion
Romeo WARD, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Romeo Ward, pro se, petitioner.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Because petitioner fails to show that he has made an express, distinct demand for performance to the circuit court, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Medberry v. Circuit Court for Brevard County, 762 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
BARFIELD, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. State, 875 So. 2d 771, 2004 WL 1362962 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
875 So. 2d 771 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Branch v. State
98 So. 3d 1275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Shanklin v. State
990 So. 2d 15 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Johnson v. State
943 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)